|
Business Litigation
Antitrust Litigation
How We Help Clients With Antitrust Problems
Our Antitrust lawyers represent clients in both civil and criminal
litigation, agency investigations, administrative actions, and related
matters. We have defended clients in investigations by the Federal
Trade Commission, civil and criminal investigations by the Department
of Justice, state investigations and proceedings, and private litigation
involving issues of monopolization, price discrimination and restraint
of trade. We have helped clients with Hart-Scott-Rodino filings in
connection with mergers and acquisitions. We also counseled clients
on antitrust matters involving Sherman Act, Clayton Act and Robinson
Patman Act issues as well as a broad range of distribution questions
involving franchising, pricing, refusals to deal, terminations, etc.
We have helped clients in the health care industry with issues such
as mergers, strategic alliances and other arrangements among competitors
in the health care field. As part of our counseling services, we have
developed a Web-based antitrust compliance program which includes
an antitrust compliance policy manual, model forms, compliance presentation
programs, training, tests, certifications, etc. This comprehensive
program is available in hard copy, as well as on disk and CD in an
interactive format that allows clients of all sizes to distribute
the program and required training directly to individual employees
or by means of an intranet system.
Who We Are
The Antitrust Practice Area includes lawyers who have worked for
government antitrust agencies, have appeared before the agencies,
and have a great deal of litigation experience.
Recent Success Stories
- In February 2002, we developed and implemented a Web-based antitrust
compliance training program for a major client in the health care field.
The program allows employees at regional sites across the country to
complete their compliance training while sitting at their desks.
- In January 2002, the Department of Justice (DOJ) granted early termination
of the Hart-Scott-Rodino premerger notification waiting period for a
major transaction involving one of our clients. Remarkably, the DOJ
approval came after the Department issued a second request for information,
which is usually a signal that the merger will be challenged.
- On December 15, 2001, the Federal Trade Commission dismissed an industry
wide investigation involving one of our clients. The Commission accused
our client and several of its competitors of restraining trade and artificially
inflating prices to consumers. We were able to persuade the FTC that
the rising prices were the result of increased costs, not price fixing.
|